The Hunt for Cunt

I was just looking on my favourite erotica forum at some recent sets by my favourite model, @ndrea Cl@arke, a model I've liked for a good 25 years, and I was struck not for the first time by one of the intrinsic problems of porn. There are only so many poses that a human being can adopt.



For decades from the early eighties until the early noughties, at least in the english-speaking world, a glamour model's career followed a set path of ever increasing explicitness, sometimes reaching all the way to being photographed and filmed in sexual activity, for british  model usually but not always on the Continent.

For me the search used usually to start with my buying an ordinary top shelf glamour magazine.  I would browse the top shelf in a newsagents and then buy one or many of the the magazines I liked the look of.

I would take the magazines home, and lie on my side on my bed working my way page by page through each magazine, slowly and gently wanking my cock while I assessed the models for attractiveness and appeal, and sexiness of pose.

@ndrea's work was usually easy to find, she appeared in all the magazines, and was a Diary Girl for one of the best UK softcore magazines.

A glamour model would usually begin her career by making a small name for herself posing baring her breasts in a tabloid newspaper, a "page 3 girl" as they were known, and would often move on from there to posing for photosets for the more restrained and tasteful top shelf girlie magazines, of which Mayfair was probably the best and classiest example. At most she would pose tastefully nude, without any heavy emphasis on her genitals and anus.

She would graduate from these relatively sedate girlie magazines to the slightly stronger, sexier magazines like Men Only, and would pose more directly, showing her naughty holes but not opening them:

 If @ndrea had any flaws they were that she was a little too small in her pelvic girdle, leading to a relatively small bottom, and that she had a very poor arsehole, a mess of skin tags - see the photo directly above - instead of the far more inviting wrinkly pucker round a tight muscular bumhole.

 Further into her career our glamour model would pose for the stronger soft-core magazines, where at the very least she would have to pose with her legs well spread and her cunt held open - or at least her cunt lips - and with the cheeks of her arse well parted to show her arsehole.

And finally she might go all the way and appear in hardcore contenental magazines

Here's our girl in a bit of hard lezzie action, getting her twat licked out and a thumb and some fingers up her arsehole

And now here's our beauty being gang-fucked in every hole and spunked over somewhere in Spain:

And to finish, @ndrea going all the way, getting not only well fucked in her wet pink twat, but experiencing a good deep bumming and getting a lashing of spunk right in her gorgeous mouth:

 

Today the pattern seems to have changed, going to explicitness and sexual activity almost immediately, and then merely permutating clothes and surroundings but not the poses and acts

Straight soft-porn hounds who are not object fetishists are interested in seeing women showing their bodies in some degree of nakedness, and beyond that in seeing those women show some female sexual characteristic, essentially an organ or an orifice. I suppose because porn is now all over the web in utter explicitness, the models who come into the business have to hit the ground running unless they have something extraordinary to offer or are very astute.

I prefer the old way.