Things You Hardly Ever Saw In Top Shelf Mags number 8

Women with Wide-Ons

Women have been showing their twats in tip shelf magazines since the early 1970s and in under the counter photographs since victorian times

Despite a wide-on being a perfectly normal sign of sexual excitement, women modelling even in the most explicit soft-core magazines virtually never showed them, no matter how vigorously they pulled at their love-lips. They were about as turned on as a rusted tap, just psssionlessly flashing gash for cash 

In 40 years of buying Top-shelf Soft-core magazines I only once saw a photograph of a woman with a wide-one - here it is...

Not so on the web - look at these girls, cunts wide open hot wet and ready.

Things You Hardly Ever Saw in Top Shelf Mags number 7

Women with dirty bottoms

This was published in a popular scandinavian pornographic magazine in the 1980s, I bought a back issue from a second-hand magazine shop near the town centre of a large British city in the late 1990s for £6.

The woman offering her shitty bum for our perusal and enjoyment went on to have a successful career as a rock musician.

And if you think that dirty bum of hers was fake, here's one of the photographs taken just seconds before of her squeezing out one of her turds.

If you don't know who she is, her first name is the same as the Saint for whom the wheel-shaped spinning fireworks is name, and her surname is the same as the noun for a person who rings a bell.

Things You Hardly Ever Saw in Top Shelf Mags number 6

Women Wiping their Bottoms

No, she's not been dabbing her cunny dry after having a wee, she's wiping her bottom, there's a smear of shit on that wad of toilet paper.

Things You Hardly Ever Saw in Top Shelf Mags number 5

Women dirtying their knickers again - but this time deliberately, unlike the young lady in Things You Hardly Ever Saw in Top Shelf Mags number 1.

This was from a shop, bought in England, but not top shelf, rather it was from a fetish mag dump box in a second-hand and import magazine shop. The magazine was published sometime in the late 90s.

Things You Hardly Ever Saw In Top Shelf Mags number 4

Dirty knickers - I can't say for sure whether that's piss or shit on the gusset of her discarded knickers, but because it's a saffron brown stain I'm guessing shit. Probably a young woman who doesn't do a thorough job when she wipes her bottom.  I'd gladly wipe her bottom for her.

Readers' Wipes anyone?

Things You Hardly Ever Saw in Top Shelf Mags number 3

GILFs, grandmothers, Older Women, Mature Women.

For most of my adult top-shelf buying life, on the rarest of occasions one would see a photoset of an older woman. I think that a British magazine, possibly Club International around 1980, featured a photo set of a woman of about 71 naked and spreading her legs.

Mostly though, old(er) women appeared in the "Readers' Wives" sections of amateur photos that appeared in many magazines.

By the year 2000 there was a niche market for magazines with titles like 40 plus, 50, 60, 70 Plus. So there was obcviously a substantial number of men who fantasized about fucking older and old women and wanted at least to wank over photos of them offering their cunts and arseholes, and even of them being shagged.

Now Mum and Granny porn makes up a smalliih but significant portion of porn on the web. 

I'm sure most men have known older women they would love to fuck, given the chance. I've known quite a few in my work.

Here are some older women who I find attractive and who I'd love to have a go on.

Above: I'd love to get my knob up her

Above: another one I'd love to get my knob in

Above: nice face and big soft titties - I'd love a go on her

Things You Hardly Ever Saw in Top Shelf Mags number 2

Tampon strings aka Fanny Mice, or indeed anything that even suggested that women have menstrual periods.

Up Her Arse pt 2

By 1990 there were mainstream english language soft-core magazines available in the UK from publishers both here and in North Ameirica.

The main british magazine was Derriere, and there were several from North America as detailed in the post here, such as "Cheeks" and "Tail Ends".

Derriere and Cheeks both had a simalar approach. They both published sets of mainstream glamour or porn models where virtually all the photographs were centred on the bum-cheeks and arsehole of the featured model. The other less popular magazines in the niche followed a similar style.

"Tail Ends" followed a different plan. It would have a few scrappy individual model sets, usually barely bottom focused, but its main photo-pages were filled with single bottom- and anal-presentation  photographs selected from old photo-sets of major models of past years, presumably the ones that photographers had been unable to sell or from sessions and models who were no longer current

Inviting arsehole close-up below

I preferred Tail Ends to all the other magazines. I bought lots of mainstream girly magazines, and had my favourite models. At the time, as the average top shelf punter would be looking for sets where his favourite model was showing her cunt, or even holding her cunt open, I would be looking for sets where my favourites were showing their buttocks, spreading them, holding them apart, and most importantly, presenting their arse-holes. Buying Tail Ends meant that I could usually find lots of individual up-the-bum shots of the women I liked best.

But the real change came in towards the end of the 1990s.

I would date the change from the start of publication of "Buttman" magazine around 1997. The Buttman stable had specialised in videos featuring women's buttocks, anuses, and anal sex. When they launched the related magazine, that focus transferred to it.

Buttman magazine wasn't easy to obtain in the UK but I was able to buy copies through a local specialist shop. The most wonderful thing for me about the magazine was that it consistently featured women with thier arseholes a-gape, so that one could see the hot pink insides of their rectums. The anal sex, the anal objectisnsertions, the models presenting their spread bum-cheeks and puckered arseholes, were not there as incidentals to some boring fucking, they were the entire point of the magazine.

It was the high-point of porn, soft and hard, for me, and it came at the very moment that Top Shelf porn declined with the rise of the web.

The important thing about the female arse to me is that it isn't meant for sex. it's meant for shitting and farting. Most women are embarrassed and ashamed about these bodily functions, and for most of them anal sex is uncomfortable and pleasureless. What could be better than have a woman accept being fucked in it.